Jewellery firms beware. Cases of logistics company officials decamping with precious cargo while in transit or goods disappearing while left unattended by a logistics provider are not covered under the jewellers block insurance policy, which covers transit related risk like theft, robbery, burglary, etc.
This was evident when a logistics company official
last week ran away with 11 kg of gold jewellery worth Rs 3.5 crore. “The owner
of the jewellery firm was entertained neither by the insurance company nor the
logistics provider,” said Surendra Mehta, national secretary, India Bullion
& Jewellers Association (IBJA).
While the police recovered 10 of the 11 kg, the news
of jewellers insurance policy not covering
“infidelity” — dishonesty by logistics company employees and /or gross
negligence of logistics companies — loss due to unattended vehicles, mysterious
disappearance of goods — has shocked the trade.
“Many only now realise that if goods disappear while
in transit because of infidelity or unattended vehicles, the extant insurance
policy doesn’t cover such loss,” said Bhavesh Kataria whose firm, Kataria jewellery insurance, is the largest insurance
broker for the trade, counting clients like Senco, PN Gadgil and Royal Chains.
Kataria said the solution lies in the logistics
company taking a fidelity policy for their employees or a jewellery insurance canada taking a third-party
fidelity policy which will cover logistics company, goldsmiths and other third
parties, their employees and contractual employees. However, he added, for
negligence of logistics company – disappearance from unattended vehicle – the
logistics company has to compulsorily have a carrier’s legal liability
insurance policy, there being “no feasible insurance cover a jeweller can take
in such a case.”
Mehta said Jewellers insurance in canada will now insist on
logistics companies having such a cover before sending goods for exhibitions
and transfer from branches.
source-https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/commodities/news/jewellery-trade-gets-an-insurance-shock/articleshow/68881662.cms
Comments
Post a Comment